SignTorch
Artist
Hyper Simp Joe Jones PlasmaCam Router Clown with 2.25 HP Router runs 35 ipm and thinks he knows what he's doing with .001" chip load cutting .0004" per HP per revolution (and less)
I found where some freak show idiot named Joe Jones made 3 youtube videos about me, after I told him to stfu
the following is a transcript where he replied to a 5 year old thread from 2015 in 2020 - I had deleted everything after his first reply because its all stupid nonsense, only to find that he went and made 3 videos about it - if he wants people to know - then people need to know
Friday, April 3, 2015
and I linked to a video that shows my Z axis pressing down and the gantry lifting up
Saturday, April 18, 2020
I found where some freak show idiot named Joe Jones made 3 youtube videos about me, after I told him to stfu
the following is a transcript where he replied to a 5 year old thread from 2015 in 2020 - I had deleted everything after his first reply because its all stupid nonsense, only to find that he went and made 3 videos about it - if he wants people to know - then people need to know
Friday, April 3, 2015
Anonymous said:Hello, I have a Plasmacam DHC that has a bad controller. I can replace the controller for $498 plus shipping. I use only a router on it cutting wood. I watched your video on changing the machine to run on Mach 3. I would like to add a Z-axis to control the height better than the Plasmacam software that I am using. The cost of upgrading with Plasmacam is too expensive for me,I as I am retired now. I am just seeking some alternatives . I know the PlasmaCam was designed to be a metal cutting machine, but with the new DesignEdge and the mods for 3D cutting available, it does offer a solution. It is just more than I want to spend right now. Maybe better off just replacing the controller and continue using it with limitations. Any input or suggestions would be appreciated.
SignTorch said:That's a good question. For me, it all hinges on the fact that the plasmacam gantry will only support a wrinky dink router and z-axis, and adding weight on the Z axis only increases instability while reducing usable speed and acceleration, so I'd recommend repairing/upgrading only for plasma cutting purposes. Or if you can't handle your own electronics and software implimentation, then retrofitting is not a turn key solution.
and I linked to a video that shows my Z axis pressing down and the gantry lifting up
Saturday, April 18, 2020
A Guy In Town (Joe Jones) said:Hi, I am curious about this comment. I run a Bosch 2.25HP router on my Samson 510 table (PlasmaCam's 'Big Brother') with no difficulties. I also run the DeWalt 611 router and get amazing results.
PlasmaCam chose the DeWalt 660 trim router for their setup, and yes, it is probably in the "rinky dink" category, but the PlasmaCam table CAN run full size routers.
Joe
SignTorch said:My lawn mower can "run" a router but that doesn't mean its good for routing.
A Guy In Town (Joe Jones) said:The PlasmaCam uses powerful motors that can EASILY handle a router. I have been running my routers on the table for years, without any indication of a problem. The Bosch 2,25 HP router can handle anything I throw at it, and the PlasmaCam table performs like a champ. Don't knock it, until you have tried it!
A Guy In Town (Joe Jones) said:That video is just laughable. That is not a PlasmaCa carriage. It is some homemade Frankenstein creation with a stepper motor that is larger and more powerful than the motor used by PlasmaCam. The PlasmCam Z motor is lying on the table next to that rediculous dial indicator test! Why don't you just put a hydraulic cylinder in place of the Z motor to show how the gantry will bow under 2,500 lb. of force! The gantry of the device looks like something made at a boy scout camp.
Add to this, the fact that a router bit is not a punch. If the bit were spinning and cutting, it would penetrate the material AS IT SHOULD, and cut AS IT SHOULD. The Z on the PlasmaCam table does not have a limit switch, which is WHY the motor is made to "skip" when the Z reaches something like what this video presents. The software detects the interference and stops. You have not build ANY interference detection into your thing. This video only shows that the person who made that backing plate / router mount doesn't know what he is doing..
The potential movement of the carriage is a non-issue, when the table is used by someone who knows what he or she is doing. That is an embarrassing video of some serious redneck engineering.
SignTorch said:You are a retarded dumb ass - there ain't no stepper motor - the servo on the Z is smaller than the OEM stepper motor - I've built interference detection if you knew what you were talking about (but of course no one uses interference detection on a router mr. know it all)
stfu go troll somewhere else
A Guy In Town (Joe Jones) said:The PlasmaCam uses TWO servo motors equipped with encoders, one for the carriage and one for the gantry. The Z motor on a PlasmaCam is a stepper motor.
A Guy In Town (Joe Jones) said:And yet, your demonstration only proves your red apparatus does not work. You cannot create some bastardized carriage for the plasmacam table, then try to drive a static router bit through a piece of aluminum, and honestly present that as evidence of a fault in plasmacam's design